User talk:Wikipediaeditor98765

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Cmstevens1993)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cmstevens1993, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

Hello Cmstevens1993, I have moved the article "Augsburg Fortress" to 1517 Media as requested. If, as I suspect, you are an employee of 1517 Media, you should declare your conflict of interest by stating that fact here or on your user page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have changed your username since I asked you about your conflict of interest. You must still comply with our CoI criteria so I will make this formal request:

Conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon

Hello Wikipediaeditor98765. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikipediaeditor98765. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wikipediaeditor98765|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]