This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is another substitle that I think is reasonable and helps give the title more context at glance. I am not sure what removing it would achieve. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The only of the five WP:CRITERIA that I see affected by the proposed move is conciseness. If you're referring to the recognizability criterion, I'm not sure why the inclusion of the subtitle would make the article title more recognizable in this case. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Conciseness" is not carte blanche to remove all substitles in titles. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course not. All five criteria would have to be considered. But as previously noted, I fail to see any other criteria being affected by this proposed move.
Moreover, I fail to see how the subtitle is any more relevant here than in Set the Night on Fire: L.A. in the Sixties, which you recently moved to remove the subtitle. What distinction do you draw between the two? 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, the subtitle is frequently omitted in reliable sources. BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.jpg){kind=small}