File talk:Semen-sperma.jpg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

lol... semen in a petri dish. Like, wow. This is clearly a very unscientific representation of semen in a petri dish. The way it is shit across from one end to the other indicates you just blew your load right onto the dish in a mess fashion. Hilarious that this is being passed off as legit though. 174.25.72.43 (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent remark, comrade. Your poetic elegance and sharp wit is comparable to that of e. e. cummings (no pun intended). 99.148.192.207 (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In a less insulting manner, I too find this picture unsuitable. The lighting is terrible, and you can barely distinguish that as semen vs anything else of a similar colour and consistency. The thickness, composition, etc isn't clear, and I think someone should take a better picture. I'd volunteer, as I have professional photography equipment and am a male, but I'm guessing someone will consider it a conflict of interest as I'm also criticizing a "competing" photo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.86.170.30 (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nah just do it, we don't mind. 68.149.159.247 (talk) 22:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


So... since it's in a petri dish it's considered educational? Wikipedia is a joke. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.131.182 (talk) 00:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


^^^ your all autistic faggots —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.139.140 (talk) 17:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Source: own work" :) But being more serious, I think that the other one (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_semen_in_petri_dish2.jpg) is better. 85.89.166.252 (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on jerking off and taking a picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mine's the scientist (talkcontribs) 13:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see you contributing anything nearly worthwhile to Wikipedia so please stfu. Kthx. 76.250.129.93 (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


you missed a spot. lawl.

this isnt even a petri dish. it's clearly a glass bowl. is it so difficult to find a suitable photo of semen presented in a scientific manner? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.31.87 (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]