File talk:Palestine-recognition-map.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lines linking disconnected territories[edit]

It is not recognized at first sight that the straight lines (for example the one around the Baltic states) are used to link the different connected components of a country. Perhaps adding a caption about such lines, or omitting them completely could be useful.(Syats (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]


Does Russia ACTUALLY recognize the State of Palestine? Crushti (talk) 00:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it seems so - [1], [2] Alinor (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Remove chile[edit]

http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=202624 74.198.9.183 (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add Chile[edit]

Chile should be coloured dark green in the map, since it oficially recognised the State of Palestine today. Source (in Spanish): http://www.latercera.com/noticia/politica/2011/01/674-336542-9-gobierno-expresa-oficialmente-reconocimiento-al-estado-palestino.shtml 201.220.232.61 (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Nico[reply]

Greece and Austria[edit]

Greece and Austria DO NOT recognize State of Palestine. Please corect this.89.76.147.225 (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the map should be corrected.
Also, we don't have sources for Suriname [3], Syria, Turkmenistan, Cameroon, Swaziland, Vanuatu. Cameroon/Swaziland/Vanuatu are supported by contradictory lists (multiple, but based on each other) that include states known not to recognize SoP and/or not including states known to recognize SoP (such as recent example of Paraguay). Suriname/Syria/Turkmenistan/Cameroon are supported by a essay by some lawyer that makes a generalizing claim "All AL/OIC members recognize SoP" that is very dubious without any such statement by the AL/OIC themselves (as organizations they recongize SoP, but this doesn't mean that each individual member recognizes it). This generalizing claim was proven wrong by the 2011 Guyana recognition [4]. Alinor (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO neither these contradictory lists (that don't give the dates of recognition) nor the generalizing AL/OIC claim can be used. We need better sources. See Talk:Foreign relations of the Palestinian National Authority. Alinor (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haiti, Jamaica, South Korea[edit]

Any source for these 'special delegations'? Alinor (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add Paraguay[edit]

Paraguay should be coloured dark green in the map, since it oficially recognised the State of Palestine today. Source (in Spanish): http://www.abc.com.py/nota/paraguay-reconoce-a-palestina-como-estado-libre-e-independiente/

Paraguay recognizes SoP since 2005. [5], [6], [7], [8]. The recent statement is just "reiteration". The map here was just wrong. Alinor (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other problems with this map[edit]

I doesn't list the Dominican Republic and it misses some non-resident delegations (but includes others). Also, there is the issue of displaying the delegations only for states that don't recognize SoP, but not for the others. Alinor (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]