File talk:PR China-SAR & SEZ-English.png

Taiwan[edit]

Why is Taiwan being shown as part of the PRC?--Yuje 11:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose[edit]

What is the purpose of this map? The special administrative regions and the special economic zones are by no way similar, nor is there anything to compare. Please show the rationale, or else IMHO this map is pretty useless. — Insta ntnood 20:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it shows theyre all on the coast and mostly southern? Taiwan needs to be colored out, which can be easily done.--Jiang 02:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although I don't always agree with Jiang's opinion, I agree that Taiwan should be colored out in this particular case. The area in dispute with India is also colored out. - Alan 07:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes.. but is that the purpose of this map? Or else why putting them on the same map? — Insta ntnood 22:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Areas not under actual control, like Arunachel Pradesh, should be colored out as well, too. --Yuje 17:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was a bit surprised to find an illustration missing. Looks like POV can be solved with a few differently coloured crayons (as well as adding a few areas), so if someone familiar with the situation could update Alan's map we can have an image back in the main article again :) -- MiG 20:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image showing up for anybody?[edit]

I can see the image on the image's page itself, but it's not showing up on any of the articles that links to it. Is this happening for anybody else? Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

kashgar[edit]

how about kashgar? it was just added as a SEZ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.126.210.99 (talk) 07:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]