File talk:Green Chicago River on Saint Patricks Day 2009.jpg

HDR?[edit]

Is this a High Dynamic Range image? Mrmcdonnell (talk) 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This looks heavily manipulated to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.69.192 (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Looks HDRish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.53.133 (talk) 07:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What a bizarre HDR... this isn't very illustrative of anything. Can we tone it down or get rid of it, considering we already have a very similar one at the top of the article? FriedBunny (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks terrible, just an over the top HDR. Agreed, the version at top is better.12.200.43.13 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the image looks horrible and just gives me a headache when I look at it. Let's get a normal non-gimmick image. BPinard 14:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BPinard (talk • contribs)

Corrupt?[edit]

When trying to view the full size version firefox tells me the image is corrupt and IE only loads the top ~15% before saying done. Is this image corrupt or is this a transient error? if it is corrupt that would be another good reason to remove it. --Murdats (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]